2013 Highlights – Book selection, #1

As I promised on Twitter (and in private, to myself), this is it, one new post to delight you all!

2013 has been a full year for me, so full that I have barely managed to reach my goal of 100 books (which you can check out here). Now, I don’t consider it a shame in general to not read a certain number of books because frankly not all of us have the dedication or the time to achieve that. It’s mostly that I feel I could’ve read more. Actually, I know I could’ve read more. I’ve slacked off and stopped reading for like two months of my summer. How ironic is that? I stopped reading during my school break, because I didn’t have enough time for it! That is why I consider this year, from a literature point of view, a bit lost.

However, I have managed to read more good books (classics, by all continents) than I have ever read. This happened because having so little time to read, I picked mostly books that mattered, so as not to spend time (I won’t say lose time because I am a firm believer you never lose time when you read) on works that didn’t matter for my culture.

The books are not ordered randomly, but in the sequence in which I read them, starting with the beginning of the year and ending about a week ago. I didn’t plan for it, but when browsing through my Goodreads records for them, I picked exactly 10 without noticing it in the beginning.

So, here we go! Top 10 books read in 2013 are…

1. 1984 – George Orwell

Read from 8 to 11 of January 2013

Original thoughts as found in my review on GR:

1984 is pure, cruel imagery. I don’t know if it’s just because of my imagination or I’m the only one who felt this, but it’s a powerful book not just in terms of “what-could-be”, but also in terms of “what-is”. Not just “what-ifs”, but more like coming to terms with the fact that some of those “what-ifs” are already here.

I’m not saying our world is 1984esque. But it’s not that far either. It’s already started on that slope and if we start going faster and faster, who can guarantee we won’t end up like that?

Along the book, I met tons and tons of greatly written lines, of thoughts that were also mine, but in different shapes. As Allan Bennett says in one of his plays, “The History Boys”: “The best moments in reading are when you come across something – a thought, a feeling, a way of looking at things – which you had thought special and particular to you. And now, here it is, set down by someone else, a person you have never met, someone even who is long dead. And it is as if a hand has come out, and taken yours.”


So, I was pretty impressed. It scored a 5 star rating from me with a standing ovation. Now, almost a year after finishing it, I still remember the plot and the force of the character and just how complex the writing is. Sometimes books like these lack in good writing, even if the subject is worth writing for. Orwell doesn’t do that. He is a perfect photographer of human emotions and thoughts and how we react to stimuli under different circumstances.

One of the classics that deserve this title, a powerful story of deceit and fear, and a clear incursion into the human mind.

Quotes I liked

Talking to her, he realized how easy it was to present an appearance of orthodoxy while having no grasp whatever of what orthodoxy meant. In a way, the world-view of the Party imposed itself most successfully on people incapable of understanding it. They could be made to accept the most flagrant violations of reality, because they never fully grasped the enormity of what was demanded of them, and were not sufficiently interested in public events to notice what was happening. By lack of understanding  they remained sane. They simply swallowed everything, and what they swallowed did them no harm, because it left no residue behind, just as a grain of corn will pass undigested through the body of a bird.

Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.

He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.

The best books… are those that tell you what you know already.

To die hating them, that was freedom.

2. Delusions of Grandeur – Jason Najum

Read from 21 to 24 of January 2013

Original thoughts as found in my review on GR:

Yeah, we have them. These delusions, these unstoppable thoughts about our world, the one we inhabit without a permit, oh yes, we know all the facts. But then comes a man that decides to write about this, to write the truth. And, what’s even better about this, he does so in our time. This book wasn’t written 50 years ago, when Kerouac was telling the truth. This book isn’t created in the times of liberation. It’s actually created when we are becoming more and more sure of our imprisonment. Jason Najum kind of reminds me of Palahniuk. Palahniuk is a phenomenal writer, but he goes a lot on the dark side, he chooses to gross people out and remind them of the beasts they are, acting like they are not. Kind of like gorillas dressed in ballerina gowns. Najum doesn’t go there. He keeps it positive, he keeps it calm and decent and still delivers the same ideas: it’s time for a fuckin’ change.


I remember how I took up this book. The author direct messaged me on Goodreads to ask if I would be available to review his work and I of course said yes. I don’t say yes to everyone who asks me that (and, shamefully, sometimes I say yes but don’t come through due to lack of time), but I liked Jason and I thought why not give it a go.

I didn’t expect it to be this good. Honestly. I thought I would read it and maybe review it at 2.5 or 3 stars and that would be it. But I was instantly hooked and finished it pretty quickly.

For a debut book, by an unknown name in the industry, this was well written. Sure it has flaws and sometimes you can feel it’s been written by a novice but it has “heart” and a lot of substance to begin with. Well deserved 4 star rating from me!

Quotes I liked

I too have a secret identity. I too burn with an innate belief that I am meant for something more, for something big and beautiful. But I stop there. That is as far as I’ll go with the comparison. Because no matter how epic I wish my story was, no matter how much I suffer and struggle and hope, I know that Superman was not this much of a pussy.

Peel the layers off until you get to its core. And you will find us. We live and suffer in a world of our own creation. The systems that cause so much harm are built by our hands. The structures that confine us sit on foundations that we have laid. The corrupt political systems, the greedy corporations, the empty culture, the wasted lives. All of it made of people, by people. Almost any part of our misery can be reduced down to us. Choose something, anything, and if you reduce it down far enough you will find us sitting there, blood on our hands and dumb looks on our faces.

3. When We Were Orphans – Kazuo Ishiguro

Read from January 27 to 28.

Original thoughts as found in my review on GR:

And seriously, after I left it on the little table next to my bed and went to sleep, I felt good. And it’s when books manage to leave me with this sort of feeling that I know it was awesome.

From my perspective, the main character was wonderfully crafted. His flaws, his qualities, his laugh, his lines, his thoughts, his story were all so well integrated in his image that I had trouble realizing I don’t actually know this man, when I started comparing him to people!

In search of his parents, Christopher realized he never left the childhood period and is only now beginning to peek a different way of thinking. As a detective, you’d expect him to be extremely evolved on all fields, but turns out he missed on a couple of things from when he was a kid. And those couple of things were his own parents.


This was my first Ishiguro book and I became a junkie for his work. He writes poetry. His lines are perfectly balanced. His syntax is just flawless. He comes through as an amazing artist, playing with different wording styles and giving off emotion through every page. It’s one of the few works in the last 20 years that speak loudly to the public and demand their attention.

It was a 4.5 star rating on GR but a perfect read in general.

Quotes I liked

Perhaps there are those who are able to go about their lives unfettered by such concerns. But for those like us, our fate is to face the world as orphans, chasing through long years the shadows of vanished parents. There is nothing for it but to try and see through our missions to the end, as best we can, for until we do so, we will be permitted no calm.

It’s all right. I’m not upset. After all, they were just things. When you’ve lost your mother and your father, you can’t care so much about things, can you?

4. Brave New World – Alduos Huxley.

Read from February 17 to 18

Original thoughts as found in my GR review:

How is it that in the case of some authors, like Huxley, I can take one book of theirs, read it, hate it, and I can then read another of their works and love it? Aldous Huxley is a good example for that. I hated Point Counter Point, but I loved Brave New World. How come!? I can’t explain it..

Kind of like that famous quote: bread and circuses, that’s what you give them in order to maintain the low level of understanding. As long as they are fed and entertained, their bellies full and their minds blank.. they’re fine. You’re fine. Everything is fine.


This book I loved so much that I reviewed for my History class. It’s the opposite of 1984, if you will. While in 1984 the population if controlled by a repressive and demanding dictatorship, here you have none of that. The people are happy. They don’t need anything, they have no cravings, their wishes are constantly fulfilled by the drug they are given, the soma, and their fighting abilities are inhibited with the use of happiness. It really is the perfect system. Their minds are so empty that they are incapable of revolting. Not out of fear, as in Orwell’s book, but out of commodity. That is way scarier than any other totalitarian system.

Quotes I liked:

“All right then,” said the savage defiantly, I’m claiming the right to be unhappy.”
“Not to mention the right to grow old and ugly and impotent; the right to have syphilis and cancer; the right to have too little to eat, the right to be lousy; the right to live in constant apprehension of what may happen tomorrow; the right to catch typhoid; the right to be tortured by unspeakable pains of every kind.”
There was a long silence.
“I claim them all,” said the Savage at last.”

…most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution.

5. The Magus – John Fowles

Read from January 4 to February 24

Original thoughts as found in my GR review:

How I got to get this book? At my friend’s house, I was, as usually looking through her library when I saw this big, fat, fluffy book with a big title, “The Magus” (though in Romanian it’s different), by John Fowles. Evidently, my eyes sparkled as they do at anything longer than 500 pages that seems serious enough for me to read, as I love long stories; the longer they are, if it’s well written, the better for me. And my friend, Ana, told me that “oh yeah, I didn’t read that, but it’s my mother’s favorite!” And I thought “hmm.. Long book, seems to be serious, and it’s her mother’s favorite”. Yep, I wanted it.

The characters. I really liked all of them. This rarely happens for me, to like every character and to feel that they are there with a purpose and that if one wouldn’t exist, everything would be dull.


It’s really nice letting a masterpiece like this settle into your soul. It’s only when you remember random stuff from the book by just looking at its title that you know you loved it. John Fowles writes complicatedly, but this intricate syntax was not enough to scare me. It’s a pleasure to decipher what he wanted to say, what’s the motivation behind this dialogue, or that description or this interior monologue. I find it hard to understand why people didn’t like this book as it has qualities that make it both commercial and off-marketed.. But then again, I can’t criticize people’s tastes in literature for that is not my job.

Quotes I liked:

“The human race is unimportant. It is the self that must not be betrayed.” “I suppose one could say that Hitler didn’t betray his self.” “You are right. He did not. But millions of Germans did betray their selves. That was the tragedy. Not that one man had the courage to be evil. But that millions had not the courage to be good.”

“I acquired expensive habits and affected manners. I got a third-class degree and a first-class illusion: that I was a poet. But nothing could have been less poetic that my seeing-through-all boredom with life in general and with making a living in particular. I was too green to know that all cynicism masks a failure to cope– an impotence, in short; and that to despise all effort is the greatest effort of all. But I did absorb a small dose of one permanently useful thing, Oxford’s greatest gift to civilized life: Socratic honesty. It showed me, very intermittently, that it is not enough to revolt against one’s past. One day I was outrageously bitter among some friends about the Army; back in my own rooms later it suddenly struck me that just because I said with impunity things that would have apoplexed my dead father, I was still no less under his influence. The truth was I was not a cynic by nature, only by revolt. I had got away from what I hated, but I hadn’t found where I loved, and so I pretended that there was nowhere to love. Handsomely equipped to fail, I went out into the world.”


Cassandra Clare – Clockwork Angel (The Infernal Devices, #1)

Could there be out there, in this world filled with stories, a bigger cliché than what this book speaks about? Let’s talk recipes, shall we? Add one teenage girl, pretty with tendencies towards beautiful, with a bit of brains and a natural curiosity. Adorne her with powers no one else has. That way you make sure  she’s the diamond of the Crown. Next, mix in there an egocetric, self-loathing but extremelly handsome man. Stirr well so they bump into each other every time. Then add the secret ingredient: the second boy. Make him.. sweet, thoughtfull, caring. Lovable, some may say. While we’re here, it doesn’t do much harm if this thoughtfull, caring and lovable guy would be slowly dying. Just makes things more dramatic. Make sure you remember that each of the two boys has special powers  and they fight death every other day, so the girl gets to see their courageos selfs. Now that you have these things in the bowl, stirr powerfully until you come up with a mixture of teenage lust, foolish acts and of course, some philosophy along the way, for the pickier eaters. Voila! You have made your own “Clockworck Angel!”

Hey guys. I haven’t done a review in a while and I really felt bad about it so I decided the next book I’m going to finish will get one. Of course, I didn’t expect it to be Clockwork Angel, but a promise is a promise. Ugh.

I found this book really annoying. I can’t say that I hated it, though. This gets 2.5 stars easily, because the story itself is pretty entertaining and it does take your mind off other problems you may have.

Before I started reading this, I didn’t even hear about Cassandra Clare or how much of a big hit she was, because this YA thing doesn’t appeal to me and I stay away from the literary circles that read this kind of literature. Of course, for others this may be their favourite kind of writing but I find it annoying, childish and simply put, not complex enough. I’ve read my share of YA, though, just to be sure I didn’t miss anything, and I found out, with a bit of a surprise, that some of the books that were written in this genre I actually enjoyed. Naturally, they all seem to be the same thing, for me. Creatures that want good people dead, some folks with supernatural powers, a vampire here, a lycanthrope there and you end up with … well, almost everything that’s in the bookstores today, since 2000 until now. There seems to be a demand for such stories and of course, when the public wants something.. you know the drill, you give it to them.

So, not hearing about Cassandra Clare and her smashing hits, I was baffled when I seemed to start stumbling upon her books on Goodreads, on and on and on. And each time one of her works would appear on my radar, it would be with a 4 or 5 star rating and a reaction kinda like “OMG BEST BOOK EVER”. One would say that when her or his friends, lots of her or his friends liked a book, she would be elligible for liking it also. One would say that when people that have read so many books that you can’t even count them and know the literary world say that Cassandra Clare knew what she was doing, they meant exactly that.

Well let me tell you something. As much as I appreaciate other people’s opinions, I think they’re wrong. This is not a good book. It’s an interesting story with some nice developments, but the book itself cannot be made just of that. It has to have a certain style, it has to come with a certain writing, the author must pay attention to details, blah blah, we all know that. So how come the only thing good about this book was the storyline itself? Maybe Clare was just lazy. She had a good thing in her hands, she could’ve made more of it. She could’ve made it better. Instead she chose to mix a bunch of things together and see what comes out.

Let’s first talk about what I liked in this book.

1. The idea. I must admit I didn’t meet this before, and whenever I didn’t meet a story before my  eyes gleam and I pay attention to it because I love detail working when an author manages to take a super known theme and turn it upside down. Well, I’ll give Cassandra Clare that: she took some super known themes and TRIED to turn them around. Unfortunatelly, she didn’t succeed all the way.

2. Yeah, that’s about it, really. The rest I found dull, despite reading the book so fast. I have come to realise that there’s no relation between how fast I can read a book and how much I like it. I’ve had books that I read in two months and I loved, I’ve had some that I read in less than a day and loved, and then I had books that I read in a day, a month or a year that I hated. Same thing happened here. I didn’t hate it, and I don’t consider it to have been a waste of my time, but it’s not a thing I recommend.

The things I didn’t like…

1. The try to set it in London of 1870s. Didn’t work. I constantly had the impression it was either a parallel world or a contemporary scene. Sorry, I just didn’g get a feel for it.

2. The love triangle. I hate love triangles. I know where this is going. No matter how Clare intended to end this book, no matter what she’s going to do with Will, Tess and Jem, I already know where she’s going. There’s only so many choices that she can pick! I can think of at least 5, 6, oh wait, 7 endings to this love triangle, and none of them appeals to me because this, the whole of this, shouldn’t have happened in the first place! Is there something wrong with YA readers that they keep wanting these 1 girl 2 guys scenes come up? When will someone come with the 2 girls, 1 guy scene? Or with the 3 girls scene? Or 3 guys? Those would be nice turns because everything is dull when you get back to the same fucking idea that the girl has to chose, the blah blah, one guy is bad, one guy is good, blah blah.

Also, throughout the book, I tried to keep some of my nastier ideas on my phone, whenever I bumped into something that I found stupid/amusing or whatever:

1. ”he gave a smile such as Lucifer migh have given before falling from heaven” no. no. lady, you’re not going the right way. You must’ve missed the “I can’t stand no bullshit wanna be smart ” lines in the middle of my literary world.
2. Apparently Aunt Harriet is some kind of a genius. Her advices seems familiar.. hm..where have I seen them? “you know a man by how he acts, not speaks”. Yeah, haven’t heard that before from a well known author?

3. Tessa reminds me of a lesser human being, known by her much hated name, Anastasia Steele. She seems to discover the obvious only after repeteadly bumping into it.
4. Five minutes after finding out what she is, she starts calling the others “humans”. Oh, Tessie, don’t be such  bitch!

5. “she had never thought about her name before, but when he said it, it was as if she was hearing it for the first time – the hard T, the caress of the double S, the way it seemed to end on a breath. Her own breath was very short when she said, soflty, “Will”. ”  Oh, puh-lease, get a room, you two, I feel nasty. UPDATE: I bet Clare would have made any name sound sexy. What if it wasn’t Will, but Mobutu Sese Seko? There’s T’s and double S’s there too!
6. Round two of nastiness: “his gaze pased over her face, down her throat, to her waist, before rising back up to her face, where it lingered on her mouth” – of course, how could we forget about the mouth? ??
7. Seriously? Vampires can’t say God? What next, a whore can’t say penis?
8. *when she offers to be taken and stop all the fighting* maybe you should just let him have me. Do I smell brains? *sniff sniff* No, wait, I was wrong.

So, in the end, this was just another book in my path. I don’t know for sure if I’m going to read the next installments, but I’m baffled at how many people consider this a really good book and I’m trying to understand what’s so OMG about it. I’ll probably never find out, even if I do read them.

For the time being, I’m going back to some good fantasy and a touch of horror, to clear my mind of all this mess.